- The increasing litigation in the field of aviation is faced: airlines, airports, and the original equipment institution, facing increasing legal audit on misleading environmental claims, with high -level issues including Ryanair and KLM highlighting the risk of exaggerated green accreditation data.
- Organizational pressure: The direction of green claims to the European Union, the competition and marketing authority in the United Kingdom now requires transparent and independent environmental data, which increases the responsibility for inappropriate or misleading marketing.
- Reducing Strategies: Companies can reduce risk through the ESG careful report, independent environmental requests, clear sustainability standards, and train staff to ensure compliance and avoid possible fraud or litigation.
Green litigation against airlines is a modern trend arising from the increasing focus on limiting carbon emissions, the continuous failure of the aviation industry in achieving the proposed environmental goals, and the inaccurate data made by airlines about the environmental measures they implemented.
Nowadays, many green flight techniques remain in its cradle, in terms of its use or development, causing the industry to be delayed in climate change, which was widely published. Airlines, which bear the weight of this negative press, tried to address them by publicly pushing their green credentials, but this led to unintentionally making some airlines with misleading data about their efforts to alleviate the environmental impact of their business. For example, Rianaire was criticized by the UK Declaration Standards Authority for a misleading declaration that it was the lowest emissions company in Europe, and KLM was found by a Dutch court to mislead consumers in a marketing campaign indicating its environmental accreditation data.
In recent years, there has been an increasing regulatory focus on transparency in terms of green credit data. For example:
(A) On March 6, 2025, the European Union’s directive regarding enabling consumers entered the green transition, which aims to process misleading information and green data through companies’ demand, among other things, to provide more transparent information to allow consumers to make enlightened environmental decisions about the products they buy. The European Union is in the process of implementing the guidance of green claims, which will require independently verifying environmental claims before publishing them; and
(B) The UK Competition and Markets Authority has a legal authority to investigate and accurate companies that make misleading environmental claims.
With the increase in environmental regulation, and with the growth of environmental activity in the face of the worsening climatic conditions, it is clear that green litigation will multiply over the coming years, and that the aviation industry will remain a rich goal for such litigation, with the possibility of greenery washing demands expanding in other actors in the aviation industry, such as airports and electronic materials. For example, many of the original motor equipment manufacturers focus on developing new technologies that seek to improve fuel efficiency, low carbon dioxide emissions, reduce noise pollution, and be sound on these new developments. However, they will need to make sure that any environmental data and sustainability make it related to these new technologies accurate and transparent, otherwise they will be at a great risk of washing claims.
Airports will also need to adopt the same caution and strictness in accordance with their general environmental data. For example, because at the present time it is easier than treating aviation emissions, many airports are currently focusing on ensuring that their operations on the ground are neutral for carbon. However, the operations on the ground are only a very small percentage of airport operations, as the main source of its emissions was the flights that operate inside and outside the airport. It is easy to see how a marketing campaign or another public statement can be about the green accreditation data of the airport, which is mysterious or unclear that it only relates to its operations on the ground, the subject of a green claim.
It is also not only the current airport operations that will be closely monitored. Any contacts with regard to the proposed airport expansion plans will need to deal with it carefully, because it will also be the subject of large scrutiny and discussion, given the tension between the logical economic basis of any expansion and environmental impact. In fact, litigation, will be widely used by environmental groups to try to bridge or delay building a third runway in London Heathrow.
Unless there is a significant improvement by the industry in achieving its sustainability goals, it is likely that the organizers and environmental groups in particular, the increasingly aggressive litigation tactics to try to comply with the goals and environmental regulations. For example, in the United Kingdom, it will not be surprising that we see fraud claims that are submitted in relation to misleading environmental data, as new legislation, the Economic Crime Law and the Transparency of Corporate 2023 makes the company responsible for failure to prevent fraudulent action committed by one of its employees. It is possible that an inaccurate statement by a company about its environmental accreditation data in a marketing campaign, was made to try to increase sales, and constitutes a fraud, especially if it is intentionally performed or neglect.
Companies can seek to alleviate the dangers of these claims by being transparent and accurate in their general data and marketing campaigns, and wherever it is possible, by searching for any environmental claims. Moreover, they should make sure they have clear standards on any environmental goals, clearly formulating ESG policies, and providing appropriate training for employees. While many of the factors resulting from this increasing focus on the demands of greenery and regulation outside the control of the company, these proactive measures are the most effective means of protection against the possibility of litigation.
About the Author
